Not done Sir, but doing.

Plenty is doing.

"These findings [of different patterns of attention by males and females in tests of field-independence] are consistent with the view that females are more willing to take in the whole field and less willing to select out and focus on one aspect of it.... [Again, another author] argues that [her finding on Kohlberg's tasks of moral reasoning] reflects a difference that boys tend to see the situation as involving separate persons in conflict, whereas girls see it as persons embedded in mutual relationships.... For the male [the approach to rationality] is a tendency towards exclusion, focussing and linear logic; for the female it is a tendency towards inclusion, broad scanning and synthesizing rather than analyzing. Now, we must be very careful about seeing these as actual sex differences.... But what seems to be emerging tentatively from these studies is the possibility of identifying two styles of dealing with the world...."

Helen WEINREICH-HASTE, 1986, in J.Harding, Perspectives on Gender and Science. Lewes : Falmer Press.

Disclaimer: this quote appears here only to spark discussion. It is not endorsed one way or the other. Make up your own mind. Or just refresh the page for another viewpoint. From a collection assembled by the late Chris Brand.